Excellent work on a disappointing spectacle, Commissioner. You did such an outstanding job on the performance of the various units, that we have little to add. We'll spend our PSI on other issues.
Coaching:
We are glad we didn’t have to grade this category. The second half adjustments were mostly very good. The problem was, they needed to be brilliant
and perfect, which they were not, because of how terrible the coaching was in
the first half. Alabama appeared to come
out tight or flat or both, if that’s possible.
Aside from the very first, unproductive, drive, the first two quarters we were out-schemed by the LSU coordinators on
both sides of the ball.
Our redzone play
calling has left some to be desired for a few weeks now. However, Coach Sark has done a good job of playing
to his team’s strengths and did a great job with Mac Jones in the Arkansas
game. Saturday afternoon? Not so much.
Defensively, we allowed far too many LSU receivers to find empty spots in
the field for uncontested catches. On one
touchdown, it appeared to us that two
LSU receivers were wide open for the score.
Sometimes it is difficult to decide whether the issue is the scheme or
the players. The coaches can draw it up
correctly, however, it is up to the
players to be in the right spot and execute. So you can attribute a few missed plays to
players making errors, being in the wrong spot, tackling poorly, dropping a pass, etc. It happens, especially in the college game. A whole half of players out of position? Nope, that is on the coaches.
Now, admittedly, this game may have actually been
lost in fall camp as player after player was injured or chose to play and/or on the third
Saturday in October and/or on the very strange injury to our best tight end. Once it was obvious
to everyone that Tua was: 1. Rusty; 2. Less than 100% healthy; and 3. Very unlikely
to run or scramble, Alabama’s options offensive options became more limited in the game where that was least affordable. Full credit to LSU for having a great plan,
recognizing limitations, and executing their schemes. Alabama turned the ball over three times a/k/a three times too many in what was essentially the Conference Championship play-in game. And usually, when a team fumbles the ball,
you credit the other team for a hard hit or the like. No
defender was within three yards on Tua’s fumble or the muffed punt snap (which
appeared to us to be perfectly on target). So you are right, Commissioner,
Alabama helped LSU beat Alabama. You
correctly point out that the punting issue was the same as a straight
fumble. And LSU converted both turnovers
into points, as well as Tua's interception. This team should have been
better prepared.
Broadcasting:
F I’m in favor of one of those
fancy Go Fund Me campaigns to buy out the rest of the CBS contract. Alabama probably cannot do it alone, but with
14 teams in the league, we ought to be able to make it happen. Shoot, we’ll throw in a free balance and
rotate for the first 50 people to sign up.
The commercials are still our major complaint. No overtime and this game ran to nearly four
hours long (aided by an awful lot of LSU player injuries from which most
players recovered in a couple of downs). Gary seemed particularly grating this
time. For example, no, Gary, Tua was not
carrying the ball in his “non-dominant” hand on the first quarter fumble. Tua is pretty famously right-handed; he just
throws with his left. Or at least we
think a lot of people know that. Gary
doesn’t. Good thing he isn’t being paid
big bucks to know details about the teams he covers or anything like that. And if we had a player make a reception like
Moss’s at the goal line, do you think Gary wouldn’t mention that “controversial”
call about 16 million times during the remainder of the game? As well as next year? “You know,
Alabama wouldn’t really be ahead right now if that call on the sideline had
gone the other way”; or “Alabama won by 5, but really that touchdown before the
half should have been a penalty….” Maybe
before next season CBS will “promote” Gary to their NFL lineup. We may ask Santa for that.
Officiating:
F. These guys were truly, truly
awful. And with how low the SEC Bar for average
officiating is currently set, that is saying something. We’ll mention three things in particular.
First, it is a tribute to the Alabama conditioning
program and the marvelous construction of the human body that Jalen Waddle was
able to leave the game Saturday night with his head still attached to his body. We cannot really recall a more obvious
uncalled facemask infraction since, well, ever.
It wasn’t that his head moved,
Waddle’s whole body turned around to face the official, opposite the direction
he had just been running full speed. The
official was maybe 10 yards downfield.
Perhaps, in his infinite wisdom and experience he realized Waddle was going
to take that one to the house so no reason to have to lean his overweight self
over to pick up the flag from the turf.
But in a league that has supposedly gotten obsessed with player safety,
ignoring a potential career-ending blow like that seems out of step. Unless, of course, you weren’t watching the
game.
Second, the little noticed targeting call on
Barmore could have been a serious problem.
Barmore seemed to be our most effective player in the middle of the defensive
line on Saturday. Barmore has been
called a couple of times this year for targeting -- one seemed legitimate, one
not so much. But this wasn’t even a
particularly hard hit. We understand
that the officials are supposed to throw the flag on the field and let the booth
sort it out. As bad a night as they were
having, we are very lucky he stayed in the game. This is especially the case if you noticed
that Tua was subject to several late-ish high hits in the pocket.
Third, the spots were an issue all night. We are complaining about this only as part of
a failure to meet a standard of competence, because it was bad for both teams.
Fourth, the Moss sideline catch was just
incomprehensible (not taking anything from LSU, it was a perfectly placed ball
and an athletic effort -- no angle we saw showed if he was in bounds at the
time of the actual catch or not).
Otherwise, this has gone from ridiculous to ludicrous, or some such
thing. Words would fail Monsieur Roget
himself.
The SEC knows it has a serious officiating problem. Now, we think they believe it is just an
incorrect impression shared by fans and that they are actually doing a bang-up
good job. Rather than attempt in any
public or demonstrable way that they are trying to improve the officiating, the
League Office has embarked on a campaign to get people to not criticize its
officials. This campaign has included
letting newspaper reporters pretend to be officials in a scrimmage or the like
so they can see first-hand how “hard" the job is. Well, that’s a fine exercise I guess, but no
one is disputing that the task is difficult – the issue is that a difficult
task is being performed poorly. We
suspect most of the reporters knew this and also knew this was nothing more
than an opportunity to try to influence their reporting.
Next was an unprompted, longish vote of confidence
from Conference Commissioner Sankey in response to, well, to nothing more than
another lousy half season of officiating from his crews of blind mice.
Then, CBS and ABC/ESPN adopted “rules experts”
that they call on for interpretations in-game.
These are mostly retired officials, as far as we can tell. The fairly obvious purpose is for them to be
apologists for the on-field officiating to the viewing public. Unfortunately, they are often in the spot of
defending the indefensible. We have
never heard one consulted on a completely missed call, like the facemask
on Waddle. You might be interested to
know that SEC Officials even have their own social media outlet to defend
themselves. Saturday evening their
responses on Twitter about the sideline catch ruling was a sad and unintentionally hilarious
montage that was somewhere between “Pay no attention to the man behind the
curtain” and “There are no American troops anywhere in Iraq”. The CBS expert was so perplexed that he
talked with someone to get an explanation that he lamely trotted out several minutes after the fact.
Wonder who called whom?
The video replay booth appears to have joined the
circle-the-wagons approach. All too
often the replay officials seem to be casting about for reasons to let calls
stand than to get them right. We have
heard it proposed that the replay process in Major League Baseball be changed
so that the officials in New York do not know what the umpire’s call on the
field originally was. I’m not sure how
you do this because the original call is often obvious from the video, but it’s
a great suggestion – that is, if what you are really focused on is getting the
calls right rather than just making yourself look better than you actually are.
No help for any of that. LSU played well and Alabama lost a winnable
game. The negative effects of that loss
are far-reaching (though we think Coach O standing at mid-field and proclaiming that BDS was now "our house" was a bit over the top). The coaches likely
have a major task ahead in getting this team prepared to play on Saturday
morning. We are interested to see how they
and the players respond. That game will
tell a lot about the character of this team.
Roll Tide.
Beat the Bulldogs.
TO COMMENT ON THIS POST, PLEASE CLICK ON THE ABOVE LINK.
No comments:
Post a Comment